SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 4315

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
LT. CDR RISHABH VERMA & ORS. VS. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
CRL.M.C. 1314/2026



$~61 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1314/2026 ARVIND KUMAR AND ANOTHER .....Petitioners Through: Petitioners with their counsel Mr.

Navin Kr Thakur, Adv.

Versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for State along with ASI Vikram Singh.

R-2 with her counsel (appearance not given).

CORAM:

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 17.02.2026

1. By way of the present petition, the petitioners are seeking quashing of FIR bearing no. 48/2021, registered at Police Station Karawal Nagar, Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter ‘IPC’) and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (hereafter ‘DP Act’).

2. The petitioners (petitioner no. 2 through video conferencing) and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsels and concerned Investigating Officer (IO) from Police Station Karawal Nagar, Delhi.

3. Briefly stated, facts of the present case are that the marriage between petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 was solemnized on 30.06.2009 as per the Hindu rites and customs and were living with each other. No child was born from their wedlock. After some time, due to different lifestyles and temperamental differences, both the parties could not reside with each other and since 01.01.2019, petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 have started living separately. Thereafter, on the complaint of respondent no.2, the present FIR was registered against the petitioners under the relevant sections. It is stated that both the parties have amicably settled the present matter vide Settlement Deed dated 22.12.2025, entered between them. It is stated that parties are presently residing together for last about seven years.

4. On a query made by this Court, respondent no.2 who has been identified by the concerned IO, has categorically stated that she has entered into compromise out of her own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. It is also stated by respondent no. 2 that the entire dispute has been amicably settled between the parties. Respondent no. 2 further states that she has no objection if the present FIR is quashed.

5. In view of the above fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will, without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.

There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

6. Accordingly, FIR bearing No. 48/2021, registered at Police Station Karawal Nagar, Delhi for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of IPC and Section 4 of the DP Act and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

7. In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed of.

8. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.

DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J FEBRUARY 17, 2026/A/R

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top