$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 675/2025 RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Chirag Ahluwalia and Mr. Mohit Maru, Advocates.

versus PAWAN KUMAR GUPTA & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr Sahil Srivastava and Ms. Taniya Bansal, Advocates for D-17.

Mr. Aakash Deep Singh, Advocate for D-22.

Mr. Abhinav Bhalla, Advocate for D-23.

Mr. Abhay Aren, Advocate for D-25.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

O R D E R

% 18.02.2026 IA NO. 4563/2026 (Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC)

1. This is a joint application under order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to ‘CPC’) filed jointly on behalf of the plaintiff as also defendant no. 17.

2. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the plaintiff as well as the defendant no. 17 have been able to amicably resolve their disputes out of Court and the terms of Settlement have been reduced into writing and are enumerated in para 6 of the present application.

3. For the purpose of convenience the said para 6 is enumerated hereunder:

“6. That during the pendency of the present suit, the Plaintiff and Defendant No. 17 have amicably arrived at a settlement under the terms and conditions provided hereinbelow:

i. The Defendant No. 17 undertakes to refrain itself, its

partners, servants, agents, dealers, distributors and all persons acting for and on its behalf from engaging directly or indirectly in manufacturing and / or offering for sale and/ or selling and / or marketing / advertising and / or adopting and / or using and / or dealing in any manner with any goods and / or services under any trademark near identical and / or deceptively similar to any of the Plaintiff's trademarks including but not limited to its registered and well-known trademarks RELIANCE and / or JIO and / or any other RELIANCE / JIO Formative Trademarks of the Plaintiff as listed in paragraphs 13 and 38 of the plaint, and / or under any other trademark which consists of the word/ mark 'RELIANCE' and/ or 'JIO' and/ or and / or

/ or any other word / mark deceptively

similar thereto, as a part thereof in any manner whatsoever.

ii. The Defendant No. 17 undertakes to refrain itself, its partners, servants, agents, dealers, distributors and all persons acting for and on its behalf from engaging directly or indirectly in manufacturing and/ or offering for sale and / or selling and / or marketing / advertising and / or adopting and / or using and / or dealing in any manner with any goods and / or services under the

impugned trade dress / packaging

and / or under any other product packaging and / or trade dress which incorporates any of the Plaintiffs trademarks including but not limited to RELIANCE and / or JIO and / or any other RELIANCE / JIO Formative Trademarks of the Plaintiff as listed in paragraphs 13 and 38 of the plaint and/ or any other trademark(s) deceptively similar / near identical thereto, as part thereof and / or which product packaging / trade dress bears any labels / artistic works near identical / deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs labels / artistic works near identical / deceptively similar to the Plaintiff’s labels / artistic works / trademarks including but not limited to

and / or under any label

/ trade dress / packaging / artistic work which consists of the word / mark RELIANCE and / or JIO and / / and / or

and / or any other word / mark deceptively similar thereto, as a part thereof in any manner whatsoever.

iii. The Defendant No. 17 hereby recognizes the Plaintiffs sole, exclusive and lawful proprietary rights, titles and interests in the Plaintiffs trademarks including but not limited to Plaintiffs registered and well-known trademarks RELIANCE, JIO, and other RELIANCE and JIO Formative Trademarks including those listed in the paragraphs 13 and 38 of the plaint. The Defendant No. 17 further recognizes the Plaintiffs sole, exclusive and lawful proprietary rights and interests in the Plaintiff's artistic works including but n