$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO (COMM) 56/2026 SUMITRA AGARWAL AND ANR. .....Appellants Through: Ms. Anukriti Pareek, Adv.

versus ZYDUS WELLNESS PRODUCTS LTD . & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Guruswamy Nataraj, Mr. Rahul Bhujbal and Mr. J. Ramachandran, Advs. for R-1.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

O R D E R

% 20.02.2026 CM APPL. 11981/2026 (for exemption)

1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of.

CM APPL. 11978/2026 (for delay)

3. This is an application filed on behalf of the appellants seeking condonation of delay of 17 days in filing the appeal.

4. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned and the application is allowed.

5. This appeal is directed against an order by which an existing ad interim order in favor of the respondents-plaintiffs was made absolute and the respondents’ application under Order XXXIX of the CPC has been allowed.

6. Issue notice.

7. Notice is accepted on behalf of Respondent 1 by Mr.

Guruswamy Natraj.

8. List on 25 March 2026 tentatively for disposal in the Supplementary List.

9. Both sides are directed to place on record short notes of their respective submissions not exceeding four pages each, with cross reference to relevant PDF page numbers, after exchanging copies with each other at least a week in advance of the next date of hearing.

CM APPL. 11980/2026 (for summoning)

10. Let the record of the learned Commercial Court be summoned and electronic copies thereof be placed on both the files.

11. The application stands disposed of.

CM APPL. 11979/2026 (for stay)

12. In view of the fact that there was an existing ad interim order in favor of the respondents which has been made absolute by the impugned order, there can be no question of stay of operation of the order.

13. The application is dismissed.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J FEBRUARY 20, 2026/gunn