$~31-32&49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11984/2024 & CM APPL. 49859/2024, CM APPL.

49860/2024, CM APPL. 8108/2025 PARENTS ASSOCIATION AHLCON PUBLIC SCHOOL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gautam Narayan, Sr. Adv with Mr. R.A. Iyer, Adv, Ms. Asmita Singh, Adv, Mr.

Geet Dehariya, Adv versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ANR.

.....Respondents Through: Mr. Ravi Sikri, Sr. Advocate with Mr.

Pulkit Tare, Advocate Mr. Deepankar Yadav, Advocate Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri, Advocate Mrs.

Parul Madaan, Advocate for R2 Mr. Dhruv Rohatgi, Ms. Chandrika Sachdev and Mr. Dhruv Kumar, Advs. for DoE

32 + W.P.(C) 15767/2024 & CM APPL. 66159/2024, CM APPL.

66160/2024, CM APPL. 8124/2025 AHLCON PUBLIC SCHOOL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gautam Narayan, Sr. Adv with Mr. R.A. Iyer, Adv, Ms. Asmita Singh, Adv, Mr.

Geet Dehariya, Adv versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Sikri, Sr. Advocate with Mr.

Pulkit Tare, Advocate Mr. Deepankar Yadav, Advocate Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri, Advocate Mrs.

Parul Madaan, Advocate for R2 Mr. Dhruv Rohatgi, Ms. Chandrika Sachdev and Mr. Dhruv Kumar, Advs. for DoE

49 + W.P.(C) 5692/2025 & CM APPL. 26001/2025, CM APPL.

11822/2026 PARENTS ASSOCIATION AHLCON PUBLIC SCHOOL THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gautam Narayan, Sr. Adv with Mr. R.A. Iyer, Adv, Ms. Asmita Singh, Adv, Mr.

Geet Dehariya, Adv versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION THROUGH ITS DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ANR.

.....Respondents Through: Mr. Manashwy Jha, Ms. Khushboo Mittal, Mr. Aryaman Vachher, Advocates on behalf of Mr. Sameer Vashisht (Standing Counsel-

Civil, GNCTD) for R1 Mr. Ravi Sikri, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pulkit Tare, Advocate Mr. Deepankar Yadav, Advocate Mr.

Jasbir Bidhuri, Advocate Mrs. Parul Madaan, Advocate for R2 CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH

O R D E R

% 20.02.2026

1. W.P.(C) 11984/2024 & W.P.(C) 5692/2025 are petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the illegal fee hike for the year 2023-24, 2024-25, 2025-26 and W.P.(C) 15767/2024 is a petition filed by the school challenging the order dated 24.06.2024 by the Department of Education (“DoE”) rejecting proposal of fee hike for the year 2023-24.

2. Even though the DoE is authorised under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 (“DSEA”) and Rules framed thereunder to approve/disapprove the fee-hike made by the school, the order dated 24.06.2024 needs to be revisited by the DoE as the same is prima facie contrary to the law laid down in Action Committee Unaided Recognized Private Schools v. DoE, W.P.(C) No. 5743 of 2024. Under DESA Rules the DoE is only required to examine whether the school is commercialising the education by indulging in profiteering.

The relevant paragraphs read as under:

“31. Respect for judicial pronouncements is one of the pillars of the edifice of the rule of law. The principle that private unaided schools do not have to seek prior approval before enhancing their fees, so long as they do not indulge in profiteering or commercialization of education by charging capitation fees, as well as the proposition that there is a distinction between "commercialisation of education" and making of profits, as enunciated in Action Committee Unaided Recognized Private Schools, remains undisturbed till date, though the decision is under challenge before the Division Bench. The only interim direction that has been passed, in order dated 3 April 2019 of the Division Bench in LPA 230/2019 (DOE v. Action Committee Unaided Recognised Public Schools) is against collection, by the school, of the interim fee hike as allowed by the DoE Circular dated 17 October 2017. On the prayer for stay of the decision in Action Committee Unaided Recognized Private Schools, the Division Bench, in its order dated 8 April 2019 in LPA 230/2019, has observed that the matter would need detailed consideration, and proceeded to fix a series of dates for hearing the issue. That hearing, however, has not taken place, and no interim stay of