SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 4751

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
POONAM VS. MANISH KUMAR (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIR & ORS.


$~81 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 188/2026, CM APPL. 12533/2026 MANJU RANI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Avinash Kumar, Mr. Pramod Kumar Tiwary and Mr. Lalit Kumar, Advocates.

versus BASANTI MALLICK .....Respondent Through: None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 24.02.2026 CM APPL. 12534/2026

1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application is disposed of.

RFA 188/2026, CM APPL. 12533/2026

3. Appeal under Section 96(1) read with Order XLI of CPC has been filed on behalf of the Appellant against Judgment / Decree dated 02.09.2025, whereby Application under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) of CPC for condonation of Delay in filing Leave to Defend Application was dismissed and Suit of the Plaintiff / Respondent under Order XXXVII of CPC for recovery of Rs.8,25,000/- along with interest @ 9% per annum, was decreed.

4. The Record shows that Suit under Order XXXVII of CPC for recovery of Rs.8,25,000/- was filed on the basis of Cheque of Rs.8,25,000/- dated 10.09.2020 drawn on Indusind Bank, in favour of Plaintiff /

Respondent, which on presentation got dishonoured on 30.09.2020 with remarks “Refer to Drawer”.

5. The Legal Notice dated 23.10.202

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top