IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
POONAM VS. MANISH KUMAR (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIR & ORS.
$~81 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 188/2026, CM APPL. 12533/2026 MANJU RANI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Avinash Kumar, Mr. Pramod Kumar Tiwary and Mr. Lalit Kumar, Advocates.
versus BASANTI MALLICK .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
% 24.02.2026 CM APPL. 12534/2026
1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
RFA 188/2026, CM APPL. 12533/2026
3. Appeal under Section 96(1) read with Order XLI of CPC has been filed on behalf of the Appellant against Judgment / Decree dated 02.09.2025, whereby Application under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) of CPC for condonation of Delay in filing Leave to Defend Application was dismissed and Suit of the Plaintiff / Respondent under Order XXXVII of CPC for recovery of Rs.8,25,000/- along with interest @ 9% per annum, was decreed.
4. The Record shows that Suit under Order XXXVII of CPC for recovery of Rs.8,25,000/- was filed on the basis of Cheque of Rs.8,25,000/- dated 10.09.2020 drawn on Indusind Bank, in favour of Plaintiff /
Respondent, which on presentation got dishonoured on 30.09.2020 with remarks “Refer to Drawer”.
5. The Legal Notice dated 23.10.202
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.