SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 4818

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
AVIATION SERVICES LLC Regd. – Appellant
Versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) – Respondent
CRL.MC. 5484/2025



* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 24th November, 2025 Pronounced on: 18th February, 2026 + CRL.MC. 5484/2025 AVIATION SERVICES LLC Regd. Office at TVARDOVSKOGO UL, 12-2IV/13, 123458, MOSCOW, RF 123458 Through its Authorized Representative Mr. Himanshu Shekhar R/o N-212, 2nd Floor, Greater Kailash-1, New Delhi -110048 Email: himanshu108@gmail.com .....Petitioner Through: Mr. B.K Singh, Mr. Narendra Kumar and Ms. Shattika Haldar, Advocates versus

1. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Through Deputy Commissioner of Police, Economic Offences Wing, Mandir Marg, New Delhi-110001 Email: dcp.eow@delhipolice.gov.in

2. MR. SUMIT AHLUWALIA @ SUNNY WALIA S/o Harminder Singh R/o 19, Central Drive, DLF Chhatarpur, Delhi-110074 & Farm No.2, Shilver Oak Lane, Satbari New Delhi-110074 .....Respondents Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State with SI Sanjeet Singh CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

J U D G M E N T

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

1. Petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as “BNSS”) / Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “Cr.P.C.”) read with Section 483(3) BNSS/Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of the Petitioner/State (NCT of Delhi) seeking cancellation of Anticipatory Bail of Respondent, Sumit Ahluwalia @ Sunny Walia granted vide Order dated 29.03.2025 passed by Ld. ASJ-05, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts in FIR No. 41/2024 under Sections 420/406/468/471/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “IPC”), at P.S. EOW.

2. It is submitted that the Petitioner was cheated for Rs. 6,05,99675.58/- on the basis of false representation/forged documents, etc. and was induced to bank transfer this amount in the accounts of M/s Mangalam Traders, Proprietor Ankit Srivastav, to export aviation goods and automobile parts to the Petitioner.

3. The Petitioner thereafter, lodged a detailed Complaint dated 20.12.2023, which culminated into registration of FIR No. 41/2024, under Section 406, 420, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC, at P.S. EOW, New Delhi. The names of all the accused, illegal beneficiaries were disclosed in the FIR. However, in the last 2 years neither any accused/illegal beneficiaries were arrested, nor any amount was attached/seized.

4. The following Chart describes the trail of misappropriated money as apparent from the ATRs filed by the I.O.:

5. It is submitted that all the accused persons, including the Respondent, Sumit Ahluwalia @ Sunny Walia, is still holding and enjoying the misappropriated money for more than two years, while on court Bail.

6. During investigation, it was clearly established that the accused persons, in active connivance and conspiracy, opened bank accounts in the names of employees viz. Ankit Srivastava, Rajveer Singh, to receive cheated amounts of Rs.6,05,99,675.58/- and divert the same to illegal beneficiaries for unlawful enrichment.

7. The I.O. stated that despite Notices under Section 41A Cr.P.C., the accused did not join investigation; instead filed Anticipatory Bail Applications.

8. It is submitted that the Ld. Sessions Court granted Bail to the Respondent, Sumit Ahluwalia @ Sunny Walia by observing that he had not directly dealt with or induced the Complainant and was not the first layer beneficiary.

9. Despite the accused holding misappropriated funds, Bail was granted. Interim bail was also granted to Ankit Srivastav to join investigation, vide Order dated 29.03.2025. However, subsequently, Bail of Ankit Srivastav was rejected on 04.07.2025, considering the huge cheating amount of Rs.

6.05 Crores received in his account.

10. Accused, Ankit Jhamb filed Anticipatory Bail and was granted interim Bail to join investigation. Though Ankit Jhamb joined investigation, he failed to produce any documents/material justifying receipt of Rs. 3.15 Crores. He was nevertheless, granted Bail on grounds of parity and joining investigation.

11. Co-accused, Vishal Oberoi filed Anticipatory Bail No. 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top