IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ARUN SURI – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT – Respondent
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. (ORAL)
CM APPL. 10454/2026-Exemption
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CM APPL. 10456/2026
2. This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 9 days in re-filing the appeal.
3. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.
4. The application stands disposed of.
MISC. APPEAL (PMLA) 13/2026 & CM APPL. 10455/2026
INTERIM RELIEF
5. The present appeal is filed under Section 42 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 [“PMLA”] assailing the impugned order dated 27th November, 2025 passed by the Appellate Tribunal under the PMLA in FPA-PMLA-2158/DLI/2018 whereby the Tribunal upheld the confirmation of the Provisional Attachment Order dated 28th July, 2017 issued by the respondent Directorate of Enforcement.
6. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the subject property, that is, 255, Sainik Vihar, Pitam Pura, Delhi was never purchased by the appellant. The said property was purchased by the father of the appellant out of his own income in the year 1991 in the joint name of appellant and his own. The said property has been with the family of the appellant continuously since the year 1991. The appellant never contributed any s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.