SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 4907

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
KALLU & ANR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on : 14.01.2026 Pronounced on : 17.02.2026 Uploaded on : 17.02.2026 + FAO 153/2019 KALLU & ANR .....Appellants Through: Mr. Rajan Sood, Ms. Ashima Sood and Ms. Megha Sood, advocates versus UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Amrita Prakash, CGSC with Mr.

Vishal Ashwani Mehta and Ms. Anju Kaushik Advocates CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

JUDGMENT

CM APPL. 16046/2019 (Seeking condonation of delay of 237 days in filing the present appeal)

1. By way of the present application, the applicants/appellants seek condonation of delay of 237 days in filing of the accompanying appeal.

2. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that after the passing of the judgment/order dated 12.04.2018 (hereinafter referred to as “impugned judgment”), the appellants were unable to file the appeal within the prescribed period. It is submitted that the delay is bona fide and neither intentional nor deliberate. It is further submitted that the appellants belong to an economically weak section and due to paucity of funds, could not obtain timely legal advice.

3. It is worthwhile to note that in “Mohsina v. Union of India” 1, a Co- ordinate Be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top