SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 4964

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
FERTIN PHARMA A/S – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS – Respondent


$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 25/2023 FERTIN PHARMA A/S .....Appellant Through: Mr. Kshitij Saxena, Mr. Saransh Vijay Vargiye and Mr. Daksh Oberoi, Advocates.

versus ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arnav Kumar and Ms. Manya Gupta, Advocates.

Date of Decision: 18th February, 2026 CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

JUDGEMENT

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J : (ORAL)

1. This is an appeal under Section 117A of the Patents Act, 1970 assailing the impugned order dated 07.02.2023 passed by the Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs under Section 15 of the Indian Patents Act, 1970, rejecting the grant of patent in patent application no.202017042442.

2. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the impugned order, this Court is inclined to set aside the impugned order and remit back for de novo consideration. The reason as to why this Court is remanding the matter would be clear from a reading of the impugned order itself. It would be appropriate and apposite to extract the said order:-

“3.0 OBJECTIONS Invention u/s 2(1) (j)

1. (i) Subject matter claimed in claims 1-30 is not an invention with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top