SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 4993

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
HARJIT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER & ORS. – Respondent


$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 19th February, 2026 + W.P.(C) 13577/2025 with CM APPL. 55705/2025 & CM APPL.

73454/2025 HARJIT SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Asish Nischal, Mr. Arun Nischal and Mr. Shivam Kumar Singh, Advocates.

versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Tajinder Virdi, Advocate for MCD (through VC).

Mr. Anubhav Gupta, Advocate for R-2.

Mr. Manish Rohilla, Advocate for R-3.

Mr. V. Chandrashekara Bharathi, Advocates for R-5.

Mr. Nakul Mohan, Advocate for R-6.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL AMIT BANSAL, J. (Oral)

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking direction to the respondent no.1/ MCD to withdraw the permission granted by it to the respondents no.4 and 5 for proposed installation and erection of Jio digital mobile tower on the terrace of the 3rd floor of the premises of the respondent no.6 bearing property no. 737, Pocket-1, Paschim Puri, New Delhi-110063 (hereinafter ‘subject property’).

2. At the time of filing of the present petition, the respondents no.4 and 5 had laid down the foundation for installation and erection of the mobile tower on the terrace o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top