SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 5030

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
OYO HOTELS AND HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SHRI DEEPANKUR PATIYAL – Respondent


* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 20.02.2026 + ARB.P. 1594/2025 OYO HOTELS AND HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kuljeet Rawal and Mr.

Aditya Joshi, Advocates.

versus SHRI DEEPANKUR PATIYAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arshi Arora and Mr. Pallav Aneja, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL)

HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.

1. The present Petition, filed under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, $~3, seeks appointment of an Arbitrator for the purpose of resolution of disputes that are stated to have arisen inter se the parties arising out of the Clause 20 as set out in Management Service Agreement dated 15.11.2024, Agreement, and which reads as follows:

“.....

20. Dispute Resolution. All dispute shall be settled amicably within 60 (sixty) days by negotiation and discussion among the Parties. Failing which, Parties shall have the right to refer such matter to arbitration in accordance with the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This Agreement shall be governed by Laws

1 Act

of India and courts at New Delhi shall have the exclusive jurisdiction to preside on matters arisi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top