$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 27^thFebruary, 2026 + CM(M) 1138/2025 & CM APPL. 68427/2025 RANDHIR KUMAR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurabh Seth, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Ms. Neelampreet, Mr. Abhiroop Rathore and Mr. Sukhvir Singh, Advocates along with Petitioner in person.

versus MANJEET SOLANKI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mohit Kumar Sharma, Advocate along with Respondent in person.

Mr. Sharique Hussain and Ms. Kirti Garg, Advocate for R-BSES (Through VC).

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA

ORDER (Oral)

Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J.

1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.

2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 assailing the order dated 26^thApril, 2025, passed by the learned Trial Court in CS SCJ No. 1843/2024, whereby the applicationofthepetitioner/plaintiffforrestorationoftheelectricityhasbeen dismissed.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is facing severe hardship on account of disconnection of electricity at the said premises, which has remained d