SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 5259

RAJAT VERMA – Appellant
Versus
H.P SUMAN – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

1. The Appeal has been filed by the Appellant herein, under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as ‘CPC’), 1908 r/w Order XLI CPC for setting aside the Judgment and Decree dated 04.04.2024 whereby the Suit of the Plaintiff/Respondent has been decreed for recovery of possession, by Ld. Principal District & Sessions Judge, Delhi.

2. C.S. No. 661/2023 titled as H.P. Suman vs. Sh. Rajat Verma, was filed by the Plaintiff/Respondent for recovery of possession, permanent injunction, recovery of arrears of rent, damages/ mesne profit and society maintenance charges.

3. The Plaintiff/Respondent stated that he was the absolute owner of a residential flat bearing No. 2-A on the ground floor, situated in Kohinoor Co-operative Group Housing Society Ltd., built on Plot No. 31, known as Bharat Apartment, I.P. Extension, Patparganj, Delhi - 110092, measuring about 91 sq. mt. (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Suit Property’). He with his family, currently resides at the address i.e. Flat No. 214-C Pocket 1, Mayur Vihar, Phase 1, Delhi-110091.

4. The Plaintiff claimed that on 01.01.2022, the Suit Property was let out to the Defendant/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top