$~

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 16^thDecember, 2025 Pronounced on: 27th March, 2026 + RFA 545/2016 RAJEEV MIGLANI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ashim Vachher, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Saiba. M. Rajpal, Advocate (M:9910946849)

versus URMIL GUJRAL & Anr. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajat Wadhwa, Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Ms. Anshika Juneja, Advocates for R-1 (M:9877135434)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

JUDGEMENT

MINI PUSHKARNA, J.

Introduction:

1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”), against the judgment and decree dated 02^nd March, 2016 (“impugned judgment”), passed by the Court of Additional District Judge (“ADJ”) – 09, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Suit No. 258/14 (Old Suit No. 179/06), titled as ―Smt. Urmal Gujral Versus Sh. Som Nath &

Ors.‖.

2. The aforesaid suit was instituted under Section 31 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (“Specific Relief Act”) by the plaintiff/respondent no. 1 herein, i.e., Smt. Urmil Gujral, inter alia, seeking a declaration that the Agreement to Sell dated 18^th August, 2006 executed by the defendant no. 1/respondent no. 2, i.e., Shri Som Nath in favour of the defendant no. 2/appel