IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
GLAXOSMITHKLINE PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
ZEE LABORATORIES LIMITED – Respondent
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 28/02/2026 + CS(COMM) 896/2025 GLAXOSMITHKLINE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. .....Plaintiff versus ZEE LABORATORIES LIMITED. ....Defendant Advocates who appeared in this case For the Plaintiff : Ms. Tanya Varma, Mr. Vardaan Anand, Ms.
Ruchika Yadav and Ms. Hansika Bajaj, Advocates.
For the Defendant : Mr. Rohit Bohra and Mr. Siddharth Bambha, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA
JUDGMENT
TEJAS KARIA, J I.A. No. 20991/2025
1. This is an Application filed by the Plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) restraining infringement of the Trade Mark, ‘PHEXIN’ (“Plaintiff’s Mark”), passing off, unfair competition, dilution etc.
2. The Defendant is using the Marks, ‘FEXIN’, ‘FEXIN-F’, ‘FEXIT’, ‘FEXIT-B’ and ‘FEXIT-M’ for sale of pharmaceutical ointments.
3. On 03.09.2025, the learned Counsel for the Defendant, on instructions, furnished an oral statement before this Court that the Defendant will discontinue the use of the Mark ‘FEXIN’ forthwith. The statement of the Defendant was taken on record and the Defendant was made bound to the statement.
4. The Defendant was, however, opposed the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.