* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 28/02/2026 + CM(M)-IPD 47/2025 INNOVATIVE DERMA CARE .....Petitioner versus VARDHAMAN SKINCARE PVT LTD & ANR. .....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case For the Petitioner : Ms. Aastha Sharma, Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh & Ms. Jahanvi Sharma, Advocates.

For the Respondent : Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr.

Shravan Kumar Bansal, Mr. Rishi Bansal & Mr. Risabh Gupta, Advocates for Respondent No. 2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA

JUDGMENT

TEJAS KARIA, J

1. ThepresentPetitionhasbeenfiledunderArticle227oftheConstitution of India, 1950 seeking setting aside of the order dated 21.11.2025 (“Impugned Order”) passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial), West District, Tis Hazari Courts, New Delhi (“Trial Court”) in CS(COMM) No. 403/2019 (“Suit”) titled as ‘Innovative Derma Care v. Vardhaman Skin Care Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.’, whereby the learned Trial Court dismissed an application (“Subject Application”) filed by the Petitioner under Order XVI Rule 1 read with Section 30 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) by way of which the Petitioner had sought permission of the learned Trial Court to bring on re