* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 28.11.2025 Pronounced on:28.02.2026 + W.P.(C) 7710/2017 & CM APPL. 32948/2023 CHINTA LAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Ritu Jain & Ms. Sreedhi Nair, Advs.

versus M/S KIRAN ENGINEERING AND SUPPLIERS AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K. Jain, Mrs. Santosh Jain & Mr. R.M. Tiwari, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR

J U D G M E N T

1. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India assailing the Award dated 30.08.2013 (hereinafter referred to as “impugned award”) passed by learned Presiding Officer, Court No. IX, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “Labour Court”) in Industrial Dispute being ID No. 191/2012, whereby, the reference of the petitioner workman was dismissed.

2. The facts necessary for deciding the controversy involved in the present writ petition is in narrow compass. It is stated that Sh. Chinta Ram (hereinafter referred to as “the petitioner workman”) had been working with the respondent No. 1 management (hereinafter referred to as “the respondent management”) at B-68/3, Wazirpur Industrial Area, Delhi-110052, as a machine operator since the year