$~P-1 to 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on 28.02.2026 Pronounced on 03.03.2026 Uploaded on 03.03.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 423/2026 RAJVEER SINGH .....Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent + BAIL APPLN. 426/2026 GURMEET SINGH .....Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent + BAIL APPLN. 427/2026 GURCHARAN SINGH .....Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent + BAIL APPLN. 443/2026 SHRI WALAYATI SINGH .....Petitioner versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Appearances:

Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Mir, Senior Advocate with Mr. Priyank Kher, Mr. Neeraj Kumar Sharma, Mr. Diwansh Tanwar and Ms. Divani Khanna, Advocates for petitioner in Item Nos. 1 to 3.

Mr. N. Hariharan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ashwin Vaish, Mr. Akshay Soni, Mr. Prakeet Bhalla, Ms. Malika Chadda, Ms. Punya Rekha Angara, Mr. Aman Akhtar, Ms. Sana Singh, Mr. Arjan Singh Mandla, Ms. Vasundhara Raj Tyagi and Ms. Vasundhara N., Advocates for Petitioner in Item No. 4.

Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP for State with SI Ramavteer, PS-

Maidan Giri in Item Nos. 1 to 4.

Mr. Navin Sharma, Advocate for complainant in Item Nos. 1 to 4.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN JUDGMNET

1. By way of these four bail applications filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [“BNSS”], the petitioners seek regular bail in connection with FIR No. 533/2025, dated 18.12.2025, registered at Police Station Maidan Garhi, for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1)/115(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 [“BNS”].

2. As all four bail applications arise out of the same FIR, they are disposed of by a common order.

3. Notice was issued in these applications on 30.01.2026 and 02.02.2026. The prosecution has filed status reports dated 06.02.2026 in each of the cases.

I. FACTUAL MATRIX

4. The FIR was registered on the complaint of one Amit Tanwar [hereinafter “the complainant”]. The allegations in the FIR may be summarised as follows:

A. The complainant and his family take bookings for weddings, parties and other functions at a property known as “Divine Farms”.

B. The venue was booked on 17/18.12.2025 by one Mr. Sukhvender Singh for the wedding reception of his son.

C. At about 11:30PM-12:00AM, it was reported by his manager Tapan that some guests were taking food out to their cars.

D. The brother of the complainant, Gaurav Tanwar [hereinafter, Gaurav”], went with Tapan and stopped a guest from taking food to his car. The guest is identified in the FIR as a “Sardar”.

E. The said guest thereafter started abusing Gaurav and called 8-10 of his relatives.

F. At this time, the complainant reached the spot, but the group of guests started assaulting Gaurav physically. The complainant started pushing them to save Gaurav, at which time two persons picked up decorative glass tubes. They started telling their companions that they had been disrespected, by being slapped in front of their relatives at the function, for which they would extract revenge by killing him. Two of the persons caught Gaurav’s arms and legs and took him to the corner with the aforesaid glass tubes, which they used as a knife. They attacked Gaurav on his head, face and neck. To save his brother, the complainant called his employees. They tried to save themselves, but 7-8 persons attacked him and his employees with chairs and other articles lying nearby. As a result, the complainant and his employees were also hurt. The assailants were shouting that the person concerned would be killed, as revenge for the insult suffered by them. Ultimately, when Gaurav fell on the ground, the assailants ran away, assuming he was dead.

G. The complainant and his employees ran after them, but were not able to catch them.

H. The assailants left their car [registration No. DL-12-CM-5157] at the banquet hall.

I. The complainant took Gaurav to AIIMS Trauma Centre, and he was subsequently operated on his eye at the Dr. Rajendra Prasad Eye Centre.

5. Although the FIR was re