SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 5351

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
STAR PROPWELL PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent


$~

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 04.02.2026 Judgment pronounced on:10.03.2026 Judgment uploaded on: 10.03.2026 + RFA(COMM) 446/2024 STAR PROPWELL PVT LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Rishu Kant Sharma, Mr.

Aryan Jha, Advs.

versus STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Jitendra Kumar, Mr. Uttam Kumar, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

J U D G M E N T

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

1. The present Appeal, filed by the Appellant [Plaintiff before the Commercial Court], assails the correctness of judgment and decree dated 13.08.2024 [hereinafter referred to as „Impugned Order‟] passed by learned Commercial Court in CS(COMM) No. 282/2020 whereby the Commercial Court dismissed the Plaintiff‟s application under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 [hereinafter referred to as „Limitation Act‟] and, consequently, dismissed the suit for recovery of Rs. 58,73,850/- as being barred by limitation.

2. The issue which arises for consideration in the present Appeal is whether the Commercial Court was justified in holding that the suit was barred by limitation and in declining the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top