SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 5401

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ST JOANS EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY – Appellant
Versus
MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED (MTNL) – Respondent


$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 11.03.2026 + ARB.P. 2096/2024 ST JOANS EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohan Sharma and Ms.

Ruchika Sharma, Advocates.

versus MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED (MTNL)

.....Respondent Through: Mr. Prashant Sharma and Mr.

Bhavya Belwal, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL)

HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.

1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Act, seeking the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes inter se the parties arising out of the Lease Deed Agreement dated 11.05.2017, Agreement

2. The material on record indicates that the arbitration clause is envisaged in the Agreement, being Clause 11, which reads as under:-

“11.0 ARBITRATION

11.1 In the event of any question, dispute or differences arising under this agreement or in connection therewith (except as to matters the decision of which is specifically provided under this agreement), the same shall be referred to the sole arbitration by the ED, MTNL Delhi Unit (hereinafter referred to as the said officer)

or any person nominated

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top