SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 5433

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAM UGRAH SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
KANCHAN MALA – Respondent


* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 21st January, 2026 Pronounced on: 12th March, 2026 + RFA 68/2026 & CM APPL. NOS. 4172/2026, 4173/2026, 4174/2026 RAM UGRAH SHARMA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Bhardwaj S. Iyengar, Advocate.

versus KANCHAN MALA .....Respondent Through: None CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

J U D G M E N T

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

CM APPL. 4174/2026 (delay of 36 days in refiling)

1. An Application has been filed by the Appellant seeking condonation of delay of 36 days in re-filing the Appeal.

2. For the reasons stated in the Application, the delay of 36 days in re-filing the Appeal, is condoned.

3. The Application is disposed of, accordingly.

CM APPL. 4173/2026 (for enlargement of time to deposit Court fees)

4. The present application has been filed by the Appellant seeking enlargement of time to deposit the court fee amounting to ₹1,00,084/-. At the outset, it is noticed that the requisite court fee on the present appeal has not been fully paid. The Registry shall compute the deficit court fee, if any, and ensure that the same is recovered from the appellant. Application is disposed of accordingly with the above direction. RFA 68/2026 &

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top