$~

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 21 January 2026 Pronounced on: 23 March 2026 + LPA 314/2019 HOLOFLEX LTD & ANR .....Appellants Through: Mr. Kumarjit Banerjee, Mr.

Gaurav Gupta and Mr. Rupal Gupta, Advs.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr. Madhav Bajaj, Adv. for UOI CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

JUDGMENT

% 23.03.2026 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. REVIEW PET. 160/2021 A. The lis

1. The Union of India, "UOI" hereinafter seeks, by means of this petition, review of judgment dated 28 February 2020, whereby we had allowed LPA 314/2019 and set aside the judgment dated 22 February 2019 passed by learned Single Judge in WP (C) 1816/2019.

2. We may note two features at the outset.

3. Firstly, as recorded in para 23 of the judgment under review, learned Counsel for the UOI had, at that stage, conceded to the position in law as advanced by learned Counsel for the appellant Holoflex Ltd, “Holoflex" hereinafter. Today, it is being sought to be urged that an erroneous concession in law does not bind, and review of the decision can legitimately be sought. Keeping in mind the fact that the i