* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 24^th MARCH, 2026 IN THE MATTER OF:

I.A. 10757/2023 IN + CS(OS) 190/2023 SHEETAL YADAV @ KOYAL .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Nitin Bhardwaj, Mr. Rohit Pratap Singh, Advocates versus SWAPNIL YADAV @ SONU & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Harvinder Singh, Advocate for D-1 & D-2 CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

JUDGMENT

I.A. 10757/2023

1. The present application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [“CPC”], has been filed on behalf of the Defendants No.1 & 2 for rejection of the Plaint on the ground that the Suit is not maintainable as it is barred by law and also does not show any cause of action.

2. The present Suit has been filed by the Plaintiff seeking partition, mandatory and permanent injunctions, rendition of accounts and mesne profits in respect of several immovable properties situated in Village Kapashera, Delhi. The parties to the Suit belong to the same family and are the legal heirs of Late Sh. Chandan Singh Yadav.

3. To adjudicate the present Application it is necessary to bring out the Plaint averments to see as to whether the Plaint is liable to be rejected under Order VII Rule 1