SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 5777

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAM NATH – Appellant
Versus
M/S HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LTD. – Respondent


$~

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 20.02.2026 Date of decision: 28.03.2026 Uploaded on: 28.03.2026 + W.P.(C) 7000/2015 RAM NATH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Avadh Bihari Kaushik, Adv.

versus M/S HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vikas Mehta, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN

JUDGMENT

SHAIL JAIN, J.

1. The present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner/Workman, Shri Ram Nath, under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking setting aside of the order dated 29.11.2014 (hereinafter referred to as the “Impugned Order”) passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court-IX, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in LCA No. 01/2014, whereby the claim of the Petitioner under Section 33C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) for computation and recovery of alleged dues was dismissed as not maintainable on the ground that the entitlement itself was disputed and required adjudication.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

2. The Petitioner/Workman, Shri Ram Nath, claims to have been initially appointed as an Accounts Assistant with M/s Kwality Ice Cream Company in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top