SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 5790

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
VARUN CHOPRA & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
SHYAM SUNDER CHOPRA SONS HUF & ORS. – Respondent


* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 28.03.2026 + CS(COMM) 291/2024, I.A. 5182/2025 & I.A. 7932/2025 VARUN CHOPRA & ANR. .....Plaintiffs versus SHYAM SUNDER CHOPRA SONS HUF & ORS. .....Defendants Advocates who appeared in this case For the Plaintiffs : Mr. Apoorv Kurup, Senior Advocate with Mr. Puneet Yadav, Mr. Sourabh Gupta, Mr. Akshansh Gupta, Mr. Gurjas Varul, Mr.

Vasudev and Ms. Priya Mittal, Advocates.

For the Defendants : Mr. Ankit Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr.

Devesh Pratap Singh, Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Mr. Imtiaj, Mr. Aditya Mr. Divya Prakash Arya, Mr. Ramadeep, Mr. Parth Gautam and Mr. Eish Kesarwani, Advocates for D-1 to D-5.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA

JUDGMENT

TEJAS KARIA, J I.A. 7808/2024 INTRODUCTION:

1. The present Suit has been filed, inter alia, for permanently restraining the Defendants from using the Marks ‘SV NATRAJ’ / ‘ ’ / ‘SV

RAJ’ / ‘ ’ / ‘RAJNUT’ / ‘SRI NATRAJ JI’ (“Impugned Marks”) allegedly infringing the Mark, Device of ‘NATRAJ GOD’ along with the

words ‘NATRAJ BRAND’/ ‘ ’, claiming to have been first adopted and put to use by the partnership firm, M/s Raja Traders consisting of two partners, Jagdaman Kumar Chopra (“J K Ch

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top