SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 5804

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SANJAY MEHRA – Appellant
Versus
SHARAD MEHRA & ORS. – Respondent
CONT.CAS(C)-1476/2023



$~J * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: 30.03.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1476/2023, CM APPLs. 63072/2023, 1251/2024, 12553/2024, 15624/2024, 19806/2024, 37040/2024 SANJAY MEHRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind Nigam (Sr. Adv.), Mr.

Akhil Sibal (Sr. Adv.) along with Mr. Manish Biala, Ms. Shivani Kher, Mr.

Devesh Ratan, Advs.

versus SHARAD MEHRA & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Chander M. Lall (Sr. Adv.) along with Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Ishith Arora, Mr. Ritwik Sharma, Ms.

Annanya Mehan, Advs.

+ CONT.CAS(C) 1862/2024, CM APPLs. 44697/2025, 49895/2025 SANJAY MEHRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind Nigam (Sr. Adv.), Mr.

Akhil Sibal (Sr. Adv.) along with Mr. Manish Biala, Ms. Shivani Kher, Mr.

Devesh Ratan, Advs.

versus SHARAD MEHRA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Chander M. Lall (Sr. Adv.) along with Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Ishith Arora, Mr. Ritwik Sharma, Ms.

Annanya Mehan, Advs.

+ CONT.CAS(C) 1880/2024, CM APPLs. 69171/2024, 69586/2024 MR SHARAD MEHRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Chander M. Lall (Sr. Adv.) along with Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Ishith Arora, Mr. Ritwik Sharma, Ms.

Annanya Mehan, Advs.

versus SANJAY MEHRA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arvind Nigam (Sr. Adv.), Mr.

Akhil Sibal (Sr. Adv.) along with Mr. Manish Biala, Ms. Shivani Kher, Mr.

Devesh Ratan, Advs.

+ CONT.CAS(C) 1958/2024, CM APPL. 72444/2024 SANJAY MEHRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind Nigam (Sr. Adv.), Mr.

Akhil Sibal (Sr. Adv.) along with Mr. Manish Biala, Ms. Shivani Kher, Mr.

Devesh Ratan, Advs.

versus SHARAD MEHRA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Chander M. Lall (Sr. Adv.) along with Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Ishith Arora, Mr. Ritwik Sharma, Ms.

Annanya Mehan, Advs.

+ CONT.CAS(C) 1993/2024, CM APPL. 74218/2024 SHARAD MEHRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Chander M. Lall (Sr. Adv.) along with Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Ishith Arora, Mr. Ritwik Sharma, Ms.

Annanya Mehan, Advs.

versus SANJAY MEHRA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arvind Nigam (Sr. Adv.), Mr.

Akhil Sibal (Sr. Adv.) along with Mr. Manish Biala, Ms. Shivani Kher, Mr.

Devesh Ratan, Advs.

+ CONT.CAS(C) 38/2024 SHARAD MEHRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Chander M. Lall (Sr. Adv.) along with Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Ishith Arora, Mr. Ritwik Sharma, Ms.

Annanya Mehan, Advs.

versus SANJAY MEHRA AND OTHERS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arvind Nigam (Sr. Adv.), Mr.

Akhil Sibal (Sr. Adv.) along with Mr. Manish Biala, Ms. Shivani Kher, Mr.

Devesh Ratan, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA

JUDGMENT

1. The present petitions allege wilful disobedience of the terms of the “Terms of Settlement dated 27.04.2023” (hereinafter “TOS”) which was entered into in FAO(OS)(COMM) No. 280/2022.

2. The relevant facts in the context of which the controversy arises are set out hereunder.

3. Mr. Sanjay Mehra (hereinafter “SM”), petitioner in CONT.CAS(C) 1476/2023, CONT.CAS(C) 1862/2024 and CONT.CAS(C) 1958/2024 and respondent in CONT.CAS(C) 1880/2024, CONT.CAS(C) 1993/2024 and CONT.CAS(C) 38/2024; and Mr. Sharad Mehra (hereinafter “SDM”), petitioner in CONT.CAS(C) 1880/2024, CONT.CAS(C) 1993/2024, CONT.CAS(C) 38/2024 and respondent in CONT.CAS(C) 1476/2023, CONT.CAS(C) 1862/2024 and CONT.CAS(C) 1958/2024, were directors of a company called “Superon Schweisstechnik India Ltd.” (Parent Company). 4. A Memorandum of Family Settlement dated 10.09.2021 (hereinafter “MOFS”) was issued, pursuant to which the business of the aforesaid parent company was divided between SM and SDM. The domestic business under the mark SUPERON was to be taken over by SM, and the export business under the mark SUPERON was to be taken over by SDM. SM received exclusive rights to use SUPERON in India, while SDM got exclusive rights to use SUPERON outside India.

5. Thereafter, vide the Sale Deed dated 16.12.2021, all IP rights of the Parent Company, including SUPERON trademarks, were sold to SM in India.

6. Subsequently, owing to disputes between SM and SDM, the latter filed OMP(I)(COMM) 261/2022 before the learned Single Judge of this Court, along with an application for in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top