SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 5836

HAJI MOHD. ALTAF – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE – Respondent


* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: 18.03.2026 Judgment pronounced on: 04.04.2026 + CRL.A. 286/2016 HAJI MOHD. ALTAF .....Appellant Through: Mr. S.C. Buttan, Mr. Himanshu Buttan, Mr. Ojasvi Annadi Shambhu and Mr. Nikhil, Advocates.

Versus THE STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for State + CRL.A. 326/2016 NARENDER SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ravin Rao, Mr. Akshit Sawal, Mr. Ayan Sharma and Mr. Akshay Mathur, Advocates.

versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for State + CRL.A. 691/2016 SUSHIL GULATI (VICTIM SINCE DECEASED)THR. LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES ASHA GULATI .....Appellant Through: Appearance not given.

versus STATE & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for State CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA

JUDGMENT

CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J.

1. CRL.A. 286/2016 and CRL.A. 326/2016 under Section

374 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (the Cr.P.C) have been filed by the first and the second accused (A1 and A2) in Sessions Case No. 141/1/2010 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, North-West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi, assailing the judgment

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top