SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 5849

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DINESH GARG – Appellant
Versus
C.B.I – Respondent


* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: 23.03.2026 Judgment pronounced on: 02.04.2026 + CRL.A. 748/2002 DINESH GARG .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Chandra, Ms. Vivya Nagpal, Mr. Ekansh Bansal and Mr.Aryan Tomar, Advocates.

Versus C.B.I. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Atul Guleria, SPP with Mr.

Aryan Rakesh and Ms. Atreyi Chatterjee, Advocates.

+ CRL.A. 763/2002 V.K. DATTA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Dalal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Raghav Bhalla, Mr. Ankit Rana, Ms. Shipra Bali, Ms. Zeba Khan, Advocates.

Versus NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Atul Guleria, SPP with Mr.

Aryan Rakesh and Ms. Atreyi Chatterjee, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA

JUDGMENT

CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J.

1. These appeals under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (the Cr.P.C.) read with Section 27 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (“the PC Act”) has been filed by accused nos. 1 and 2 (A1 and A2) in C.C.No.109/1994 on the file of the Court of Special Judge, Delhi, challenging the conviction entered and sentence passed against them for the offences punishable under Section 7 and 13(1) (d) read with 13(2) of the PC Act.

2. The prose

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top