IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SANTOSH VITTHALRAO INDRAKSHA & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – Respondent
$~58 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 970/2021, CM APPLs. 2620/2021, 10122/2021, 10838/2021, 53363/2022, 53364/2022, 53365/2022, 10526/2023, 10527/2023, 12863/2023 & 58225/2023 SANTOSH VITTHALRAO INDRAKSHA & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jay Savla, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sameer Kumar and Mr. Vaibhav Pachauri, Advs.
versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Kushagra Kumar and Mr.
Amit Kumar Rana, Advs. for UOI Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Mr. Mahinder Singh Hura, Mr. Saif Ali, Mr. Pushpendra S. Bhadoriya, Mr. Vijay Sharma, Mr. Pranav Menon, Mr. Ajith Williyam S. and Mr.
Saurav, Advs. for R-6, R-7, R-9 & R-11 Mr. M.K. Madan and Mr. Gunit Shah, Advs.
for R-15 Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj and Ms. Sakshi Saugat, Advs. for R-10 CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA JUDGMENT (ORAL)
% 02.04.2026 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
1. Respondents 6 to 16, 1“theprivaterespondents”hereinafter were appointed as Technical Officers in the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare in 2015. They were promoted as Assistant Drug Controllers, 2“ADCs”,hereinafter on 1 May 2015.
2. As against this, the petitioners were appointed as ADCs by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.