SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 5952

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MAHENDRA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on : 19.03.2026 Pronounced on : 02.04.2026 Uploaded on : 02.04.2026 + FAO 477/2019 MAHENDRA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Rajan Sood, Ms. Ashima Sood and Ms. Megha Sood, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shubash Tanwar, CGSC with Mr.Naveen, Mr. Sandeep Mishra, Mr.Harshit Deshwal, Ms. Priyanka and Ms. Ritu, Advocates CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

JUDGMENT

CM APPL. 51677/2019 (Seeking condonation of delay of 175 days in filing the appeal)

1. By way of the present application, the applicant/ appellant seeks condonation of delay of 175 days in filing the appeal.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that after passing of the impugned judgment, the appellant could not file the present appeal in time on account of paucity of funds and the resultant inability to obtain timely legal advice. It is further submitted that the delay is neither intentional nor deliberate.

3. In this regard, reference may be made to the decision of this Court in Mohsina vs. Union of India1, wherein a delay of 804 days in filing of the appeal was condoned taking into account the socio-economic condition of the clai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top