$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 7^th April, 2026 Uploaded on: 9^th April, 2026 + CRL.A. 567/2015 STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Appellant Through: Mr.RiteshKr.Bahri,APPfortheState with Ms. Divya Yadav and Mr. Lalit Luthra, Advs.

versus MUKESH & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu (DHCLSC), Ms.

Devyani Singh, Advs.

CORAM:

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J.

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. ThisisanappealfiledbytheState(Govt.ofNCTofDelhi)challenging thejudgmentdated3rdNovember,2014andtheorderonsentencedated22nd November, 2014 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Rohini, Delhi in Sessions Case No. 28/1 titled ‘State v. Mukesh & Anr.’ arising out of FIR No. 169/09, registered at PS Mangol Puri, Delhi.

3. Vide the impugned judgment dated 3rd November, 2014, the ld. Trial Court had held the two accused persons guiltyand had convicted themfor the offence u/s 326/34, IPC.

4. Further, vide order on sentence dated 22nd November, 2014, benefit of probation was given to both accused persons and a sum of Rs. 2,500/- each was directed to be paid as compensation to the injured person/victim– Rafiq.