$~223 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : 07.04.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 568/2026 CHANDRA SHEKHAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Sharma, Mr. Rounak Ramakrishna and Mr. Nikhil Purohit, Advs. versus S.K. MEENA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. M. S. Oberoi, SC, Ms. Saguna Sinha, Adv. for R-1 to 3.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL CM APPL.22222/2026 (Exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of.

CONT.CAS(C) 568/2026

3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging wilful disobedience of the directions contained in the judgment/ order dated

30.07.2025, passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No. 11207/2025.

4. The controversy revolves around the directions contained in the aforesaid order pertaining to property bearing Municipal No.103-G, Khasra No.109/1, Zamrudpur Village, New Delhi, (hereinafter “subject property”)

owned and possessed by the petitioner.

5. It is the case of the petitioner that his title/ ownership over the subject property stands affirmed by a judgment and decree dated 28.02.2012, passed by the ADJ-03, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi in RCA No.01/2010.

6. Subs