SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6133

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SHABNAM – Appellant
Versus
MANJU ROHATGI – Respondent


$~69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 13th April, 2026 + CM(M) 795/2026, CM APPL. 23679/2026 & CM APPL. 23680/2026 SHABNAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish Pratap Singh, Advocate (through VC).

versus MANJU ROHATGI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Singh Chauhan and Ms.

Rakshita Sharma, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA

ORDER (Oral)

Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J.

1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.

2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 oftheConstitution ofIndia,1950,assailingtheorderdated08thJanuary,2026 passed by the learned Trial Court in CS SCJ No. 146/24, whereby an application filed by the petitioner/defendant under Order XVIII Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for recalling PW1 for cross-examination has been dismissed.

3. Learned Counsel for the respondent appears on advance notice and accepts notice.

4. The matter is taken up for hearing with the consent of the learned counsels for the parties.

5. Heard. Record perused.

6. Learned counsel for the respondent/plaintiff submits that he has no objection if the present petition is allowed, however, the same be allowed subjec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top