SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6164

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PEPSICO INC. & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
PARLE AGRO PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent


* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order reserved on : 07.04.2026 Order delivered on: 15.04.2026 + CS(COMM) 268/2021 PEPSICO INC. & ANR. .....Plaintiffs versus PARLE AGRO PRIVATE LIMITED .....Defendant Advocates who appeared in this case:

For the Plaintiff : Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Ms.

Avni Sharma, Ms. Aparna Singh, Mr. Deepak Gogia, Mr. Aadhar Nautiyal and Ms. Shivangi Kohli, Advocates.

For the Defendant : Mr. C.M. Lall, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ankit Arvind, Mr. Shashwat Rakshit and Ms. Nidhi Pathak, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

O R D E R

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J:

I.A. 524/2026 (Under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC)

1. This is an application under Order XXXIX Rule 2A read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred as “CPC”) filed on behalf of the plaintiffs seeking a direction to hold the defendant as also its principal officers guilty of wilfully violating and disobeying the order dated 18.09.2023, passed by this Court.

2. In the suit, the plaintiffs have sought a decree of permanent injunction, restraining infringement of registered trademark/tagline “For The Bold”, passing off, dilution, delivery up, damages and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top