IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
M/S. TECHMAN ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SMT. MANJU JAIN & ANR. – Respondent
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : 15.04.2026 + ARB.P. 2048/2025 M/S. TECHMAN ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jeevesh Nagrath, Senior Advocate along with Ms. Ansha Varma and Ms. Apurva Srivastava, Advocates.
versus SMT. MANJU JAIN & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ashish Mohan, Senior Advocates along with Mr.
Sumeher Bajaj, Mr. Auritro Mukharjee and Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL)
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.
1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, $~2 , seeking the appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes inter se the parties.
2. The Arbitration Clause is set out at Clause 43 of the Collaboration Agreement dated 22.07.2004, Agreement, which reads as follows:
“43. Any dispute and/or difference arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, including with respect to an interpretation of any provision hereof, (other than the dispute referred to in Clause
26 above) the same shall be referred to arbitration in accordance with the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (or any
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.