SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6184

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
M/S. TECHMAN ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SMT. MANJU JAIN & ANR. – Respondent


* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : 15.04.2026 + ARB.P. 2048/2025 M/S. TECHMAN ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jeevesh Nagrath, Senior Advocate along with Ms. Ansha Varma and Ms. Apurva Srivastava, Advocates.

versus SMT. MANJU JAIN & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ashish Mohan, Senior Advocates along with Mr.

Sumeher Bajaj, Mr. Auritro Mukharjee and Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL)

HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.

1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, $~2 , seeking the appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes inter se the parties.

2. The Arbitration Clause is set out at Clause 43 of the Collaboration Agreement dated 22.07.2004, Agreement, which reads as follows:

“43. Any dispute and/or difference arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, including with respect to an interpretation of any provision hereof, (other than the dispute referred to in Clause

1 Act

26 above) the same shall be referred to arbitration in accordance with the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (or any

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top