SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 48681

Tommy Hilfiger Europe BV – Appellant
Versus
Partha Chatterjee – Respondent


TEJAS KARIA, J. (ORAL)

1. I.A. 29751/2025 has been filed on behalf of the Plaintiff under Order XIII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”), seeking pronouncement of judgment against the Defendant.

2. The Plaintiff has filed the present Suit for a decree of permanent injunction restraining infringement of its Trade Marks, ‘TOMMY HILFIGER’, ‘TOMMY’, ‘TOMMY SPORT’, ‘TOMMY GIRL’, ‘DREAMING TOMMY HILFIGER’, ‘ ’, ‘ ’,

‘ ’, ‘ ’, ‘ ’, ‘ ’, and ‘ ’ (“Plaintiff’s Marks”) passing off, dilution, damages, rendition of accounts, delivery up, etc.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

3. Vide Order dated 20.12.2018, an ex-parte ad-interim injunction was passed restraining the Defendant, its partners, if any, officers, servants, agents, distributors, stockists and representatives from manufacturing, selling and/or offering for sale, advertising, or directly or indirectly dealing in any manner, in any goods bearing the registered Trade Mark, ‘TOMMY HILFIGER’, or any other similar Mark.

4. Vide Order dated 07.03.2019, the bank accounts of the Defendant were directed to be frozen and since the Defendant had refused service of summons, the Defendant was directed to be served once again through WhatsApp, e-mail

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top