Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Swarana Kanta Sharma, J
Sandeepa Virk – Appellant
Versus
Directorate Of Enforcement – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of factual background and allegations under pmla. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. contending arguments concerning bail, role of the accused, and statutory interpretation. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. judicial assessment of evidence and applicability of statutory provisions for women. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. final outcome and conditions imposed for grant of bail. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT
DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
1. The applicant has approached this Court, seeking grant of regular bail in case arising out of ECIR No. ECIR/HIU-II/24/2025, recorded by the Directorate of Enforcement [hereafter ‘DoE’] for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 3/4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 [hereafter ‘PMLA’].
Factual Background
2. Succinctly, it is the case of the DoE that one FIR No. 91/2016 was registered on 16.11.2016 at Police Station Phase-8, SAS Nagar, Mohali, for commission of offence under Sections 406/420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [hereafter ‘IPC’] against accused Amit Gupta @ Nageshwar Gupta and other co-accused persons (including applicant herein). The allegations in the said FIR are that the accused persons
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
