Back
Navin Chawla, Renu Bhatnagar, JJ
Shikha Badhani – Appellant
Versus
Hemant Badhani – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of factual background for maintenance appeal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. summary of rival contentions regarding financial status and maintenance entitlement. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. court holds maintenance is based on lifestyle parity, not mere subsistence or income equality. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 4. final order and enhancement of maintenance amount. (Para 33 , 34 , 35) |
UDGMENT
RENU BHATNAGAR, J.
1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant, under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, challenging the Order dated 01.03.2024 (hereinafter referred to as the „Impugned Order‟) passed by the Learned Judge, Family Court-01, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the „Family Court‟), in HMA No. 1074/2020, titled Hemant Badhani v. Shikha Badhani. By the Impugned Order, the learned Family Court partly allowed the application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the „HMA‟) filed by the appellant-wife, awarding maintenance of Rs. 35,000/- per month along with all school-related expenses for the minor
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
