$~80

%

[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

CAV 56/2025

1. In view of appearance of the respondent through counsel in present appeal, the caveat stands discharged.

CM APPL. 5925/2025 (exemption)

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

RFA 80/2025

3. Some advocate standing in a park with a mobile phone in his hand seeks to appear as counsel for appellants.

4. It has been repeatedly observed in a number of cases that appearance through videoconferencing must be encouraged because it is extremely difficult for advocates to run around the different court complexes in Delhi and the establishment has already incurred substantial expenditure on electronic infrastructure. Further, when an advocate sitting in her/his office

wants to appear through videoconferencing before different court complexes on same day, she/he can assist the courts with convenience and in a better manner. But for that, the counsel has to understand that the decorum of the court must be kept in mind. Quite often, on account of connectivity issues at the end of counsel appearing through videoconferencing the counsel remains inaudible. Often, the video is not switched on. The hybrid courts also are co