2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 48790
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Pronounced on: 31st July, 2025
CRL.A. 798/2025
STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Appellant
Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Vikas Bhardwaj
Versus
1. JAIDEV .....Respondent No. 1
S/o SH. NAFE SINGH
2. JAGMAL .....Respondent No. 2
S/o SH. NAFE SINGH
3. JAGDEV .....Respondent No. 3
S/o SH. NAFE SINGH
4. SURAJ BHAN ALIAS MONU .....Respondent No. 4
S/o SH. JAIDEV
XXX, DURGA PURI, SHAHDARA, DELHI
Through: Mr. R.N. Sharma & Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocates for Respondents No.1 & 4
Mr. Satyam Thareja & Mr. Shaurya Katoch, Advocates for Respondent No.3
Mr. Shalabh Gupta & Ms. Vandita Gupta, Advocates for Complainant
CRL.A. 833/2025
1. ‘J’ .....Appellant No.1
W/O MR. YOGENDER KUMAR
2. ‘XYZ’ .....Appellant No.2
(Identity not disclosed being minor victim)
THROUGH APPELLANT NO.1
Through: Mr. Shalabh Gupta & Ms. Vandita Gupta, Advocates
Versus
1. THE STATE .....Respondent No. 1
5, SHAMNATH MARG, NEW DELHI.
2. JAIDEV .....Respondent No. 2
S/o SH. NAFE SINGH
3. SURAJ BHAN .....Respondent No. 3
S/o JAIDEV
4. JAGMAL SINGH .....Respondent No. 4
S/o SH. NAFE SINGH
5. JAGDEV SINGH .....Respondent No. 5
S/o SH. NAFE SINGH
Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Vikas Bhardwaj
Mr. Satyam Thareja & Mr. Shaurya Katoch, Advocates for Respondent No.5
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
J U D G M E N T
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.
1. This Court vide Judgment dated 28.05.2025, has convicted the Respondent/Jaidev for the offences punishable under Section 294/354-A/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “IPC”) and Section 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as “POCSO Act”). The Respondents, Suraj Bhan @ Monu and Jagmal have been convicted for the offences punishable under Section 354-A/509/34 IPC.
2. The Respondent No.1/Convict Jaidev in his Affidavit has submitted that he has been suffering from Mental Disorder and has been taking treatment from Institute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences (IHBAS). He was discharged/compulsorily retired from Delhi Police. He tried to find work, but could not get any regular job. He does odd jobs as his health permits and has no regular professional income.
3. His wife is 54 years old who suffers from High Blood Pressure, Osteoporosis, Cervical etc. His son, Suraj Bhan has also been convicted in this case. He also had aged parents of about 85 years of age who suffer from various old age ailments. He has two brothers who help in taking care of his parents. One of the brother is Respondent No.2/Jagmal Singh who has also been convicted in the present FIR.
4. The Convict/Jaidev further submits that he has not been convicted in any other offence except in the present case. In the last nine years to his knowledge, no fresh Complaint has been filed by the Complainant or her family member against him despite being neighbours.
5. It is submitted that the incident happened 12 years ago and he had throughout cooperated with the Authorities and the Judicial system.
6. The Respondent No.2/Convict Jagmal in his Affidavit has stated that he is 55 years old. His wife is 50 years old and he has a daughter and a son aged 18 years and 15 years, respectively.
7. His wife suffers from Prolapsed Intervertebral Disc/Herniated or Slip Disc, Lower Respiratory Tract Infection and Vertigo. His aged parents are around 85 years of age. His father suffers from UTI/renal failure and has to be hospitalized regularly. The Discharge Summary of his father Shri Nafe Singh dated 05.02.2025 and 20.05.2025 are annexed with the Affidavit. His mother also suffers from renal failure and is getting treatment at Yashoda Super Speciality Hospital, Kaushambi, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh.
8. It is submitted that he himself is a heart patient and has been diagnosed with hypokinetic basal anterior septum which is reduced movement of the heart’s basal anterior septum i.e. a specific region of the heart’s wall. His left ventricular ejection fraction is 45%.
9. The Convict Jagmal has further submitted that he is 12th pass and is the sole bread earner of the family. He is in Government job since 2002 and is currently working as a Constable in Delhi Police. He has been rewarded and given commendations by his Superior, for the work done by him. He has never ever been convicted in any other offence except the present case.
10. The FIR was registered in May, 2013 i.e. 12 years ago and he has co-operated with the Authorities and Judicial system throughout this period.
11. The Respondent No.4/Convict Suraj Bhan Singh in his Affidavit has submitted that he is 36 years old while his wife is 31 years of age and he has three children aged 13 years, 9 years and 1.5 years respectively.
12. His parents are dependent upon him and they do not have any professional income. His father suffers from Mental Disorder for which he has been given treatment from Institute of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences (IHBAS) and his mother also suffers from various ailments.
13. The Convict, Suraj Bhan further submits that he is a graduate having done B.A. (Hons.) Political Science from Delhi University. He is the sole bread earner of the family being in Government employment since 2009 and is working as Head Constable in Delhi Police In the past 9 years and more, there is no fresh Complaint filed against him by the