SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 48557

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI


W.P.(C) 5614/2025


SAISHA CHHILLAR MINOR REPRESENTED THROUGH HER MOTHER MS. JYOTI CHHILLAR .....Petitioner


versus


THE DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS......Respondents


Through: Mr. Puneet Singh Bindra, Mr. Vivek Kadyan, Mr. Nitin Saroha, Ms. Charu Modi, Ms. Sukriti Seth, Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Ms. Kriti Dang and Ms. Shanya Shukla, Advs.


Through: Mr. Dhruv Rohatgi, Ms. Chandrika Sachdev and Mr. Dhruv Kumar, Advs. for R-1/DOE


Mr. R.D. Singh and Mr. Prateek Jindal, Advs. for R-3


CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN


30.04.2025

ORDER

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

CM APPL. 25587/2025 (exemption)

2. Application stands disposed of.

3. The present petition has been filed seeking following relief:

“a. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondent No.1 & 2 to issue the Transfer Certificate (TC) of the Petitioner in favour of Respondent No.4.

b. Award cost of litigation in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents.”

4. The case set out in the present petition is that petitioner is a minor child residing with her mother at House No. 163, G-Block, Palam Vihar, Gurugram (Haryana)-122017.

5. The mother of the child got separated form her husband i.e. petitioner’s father on 10.04.2024 when the child was studying in class IIC in Montfort School, Phase-1, Ashok Vihar, New Delhi-110052. After separation, the mother of the petitioner shifted to Gurugram at the aforesaid address where her parents are stated to be residing. Thereafter, the child was admitted to Gems International School, C-2 Block, Palam Vihar, Gurugram, Haryana-122017.

6. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has now completed one year of her studies in the school at Gurugram but since the earlier school i.e. Montfort School, Phase-1, Ashok Vihar, New Delhi-110052 has declined the issuance of Transfer Certificate (TC) to the petitioner for the reason that the petitioner’s father has written to the school for non-issuance of such Transfer Certificate (TC), the same is not being issued.

7. He submits that in the absence of Transfer Certificate (TC) from Montfort School, Phase-1, Ashok Vihar, New Delhi-110052, the petitioner has been promoted provisionally but the Gems International School at Gurugram is insisting on the Transfer Certificate (TC).

8. He submits that though the guardianship dispute is pending before the learned Family Court but no direction has been passed by the learned Family Court directing non-issuance of Transfer Certificate (TC) by

School, Ashok Vihar.

9. In view of the above, issue notice.

10. Mr. Dhruv Rohatgi, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.1 accepts notice. Likewise, Mr. R.D. Singh, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.3 (father of the petitioner) also accepts notice.

11. However, there is no appearance on behalf of the respondent no.2/ Montfort School, as well as, on behalf of the respondent no.4/ Gems International School.

12. On a query posed by this Court, Mr. Singh fairly concedes that there is no order or direction passed by the learned Family Court either in the guardianship petition or in the divorce petition directing the Montfort School not to issue Transfer Certificate (TC).

13. He also fairly states that the respondent no.3 had made an application to the Montfort School for non-issuance of the Transfer Certificate (TC) to the petitioner since there is a litigation going on between the respondent no.3 as well as the mother of the petitioner.

14. Mr. Rohatgi refers to Section 5(3) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, which reads thus:

“5(3) For seeking admission in such other school, the Head-teacher or in-charge of the school where such child was last admitted, shall immediately issue the transfer certificate:

Provided that delay in producing transfer certificate shall not be a ground for either delaying or denying admission in such other school:

Provided further that the Head-teacher or in-charge of the school delaying issuance of transfer certificate shall be liable for disciplinary action under the service rules

applicable to him or her.”

15. A perusal of the above quoted provision clearly shows that the same mandates that the school cannot deny the issuance of Transfer Certificate (TC) to the child who has sought admission in other school. In the event of delay in issuance of Transfer Certificate, even a disciplinary action can be taken against the Head-Master or In-Charge of the school.

16. Needless

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top