SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 48394

PUMA SE v. HIMANSHU SHARMA


1. The plaintiff, by way of the captioned suit, seeks permanent injunction, infringement of trademark, passing off, damages, delivery up, etc., against the defendant.

2. As per the plaintiff, it is one of the most reputed companies/ brands engaging in the business of selling, manufacturing, and advertising sports apparel and accessories inter alia, throughout the globe. The plaintiff has spent substantial amounts towards the advertisement and marketing of its brand, within India and in international markets, and has also generated significant revenue therefrom. The plaintiff, in order to carry out business, has secured multiple registrations for their trademark in various countries, and their trademark has garnered a well-known status in India by the Trade Mark Registry vide Trade Mark Journal bearing no.2144 dated 19.02.2024.

3. The defendant herein is engaged in the business of stocking, selling, and supplying counterfeit shoes bearing the plaintiff’s trademarks i.e. PUMA”/ and logo i.e. and also engaged in selling the counterfeiting products and the registrant of domain name/ website i.e. “www.theshoeskart.com,” on which the aforementioned products are sold.

4. In or around th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top