Back
Amit Bansal, J
Aktiebolaget Volvo & Ors. v. Shri Ganesh Motor Body Repairs & Ors.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural compliance for commercial court suits and exemption from mediation for urgent relief. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. registration of suit and procedural management of interrogatories and document filing. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 3. establishment of plaintiffs' well-known status, trademark registration, and reputation for the 'grille-slash' design. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 4. evidence of defendant infringement through manufacture and sale of lookalike counterfeit products. (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 5. granting ad-interim injunction to prevent trademark infringement and protect established business goodwill. (Para 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74) |
I.A. 14596/2025(O-XI R-1(4) of CPC, 1908)
1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the plaintiffs seeking leave to file additional documents under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
2. The plaintiffs are permitted to file additional documents in accordance with the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and the Delhi High Court
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
