SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

Shambhu Nath Rai v. Union Of India & Ors.


* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7318/2025 SHAMBHU NATH RAI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul Bajaj, Mr. Amritesh Mishra and Ms. Sarah, Advs.

Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Viplav Acharya, Sr. PC for UOI CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA JUDGMENT (ORAL)

% 18.11.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

1. The petitioner is an Assistant Sub Inspector/General Duty posted in the 171st Battalion of the Border Security Force, $~45 at Silchar, Assam. His son, Satyendra Kumar, is in Delhi. Silchar is 2107 kms away from Delhi.

2. On the ground that his son was suffering from Muscular Dystrophy in his lower limbs and needed the petitioner’s assistance

1“BSF”,hereinafter

even for normal daily activities, the petitioner preferred a representation, praying that he be relocated to Delhi or posted at a place where facilities to treat his son were available. The petitioner suggested that he could be posted at Kolkata or Bangalore.

3. The petitioner had approached this Court by way of WP (C) 5125/2022 when he was posted at Delhi, challenging his transfer to Silchar. This Court, by order dated 12 September 2024, declined to inter

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top