SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Rasiklal Mohanlal Gangani v. State & Anr.


1. The present petition is filed challenging the order dated 28.09.2013 (hereafter ‘impugned order’), passed by the learned Trial Court, in CC No. 99/0109, and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom.

2. By the impugned order, the learned Trial Court has summoned the petitioner for the commission of the offence punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’).

3. The brief facts of the case are as follows:

3.1. A complaint was filed by the complainant company/ Respondent No.2 (earlier known as M/s. Indiabulls Securities Ltd.) under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘CrPC’) against the petitioner for the offence under Section 420 of the IPC. It

is the case of the complainant company that it is engaged in the business of stock broking and it provides stock trading services to its clients and thus acts as a transaction facilitator between its clients and the Bombay Stock Exchange and the National Stock Exchange. It is alleged that the petitioner was one of the clients of the complainant company and the petitioner had entered into a Member Client Agreement dated 03.01.2007 with the complainant company. The petitioner had been informed of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top