IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MAYANK JAIN PROPRIETOR OF MAHAVEER UDYOG – Appellant
Versus
ATULYA DISCS PVT LTD & ORS. – Respondent
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : 13.04.2026 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 100/2026 CM APPL. 23776/2026 CM APPL.
23777/2026 CM APPL. 23778/2026 CM APPL. 23779/2026 CM APPL. 23780/2026 MAYANK JAIN PROPRIETOR OF MAHAVEER UDYOG .....Appellant Through: Mr. R. P. Yadav, Mr. Riju Mani Talukdar and Mr. Divyanshu Yadav, Advs. versus ATULYA DISCS PVT LTD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J. (ORAL
1. The present appeal has been filed against the order dated 09.01.2026 [‘impugned order’] passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in I.A. 11309/2025 in CS (Comm) No. 412/2025 titled Mayank Jain, Proprietor of Mahaveer Udyog v. M/s Atulya Discs Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
2. Appellant is a proprietorship firm engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading of agricultural implements more specifically harrows disc. It adopted the mark TIGER GOLD BRAND
[‘label’] [‘Appellant’s mark’] and has been using it for
its goods since 06.05.2010.
2.1. Appellant filed an application for registration of TIGER GOLD BRAND (label) in Class 7 on 01.06.2022, which was registered by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.