SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6243

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
HARI PRASAD PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE THRU C.B.I. – Respondent


* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: 06.04.2026 Judgment pronounced on: 16.04.2026 + CRL.A. 789/2003 HARI PRASAD PANDEY .....Appellant Through: Mr. Anurag Andley, Mr. Aditya Antlay and Mr. Sahil Nagar, Advocates.

Versus THE STATE THRU. C.B.I .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vikrant Pachnanda and Mr.Mukul Katyal, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA

JUDGMENT

CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J.

1. In this appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (the Cr.PC) the sole accused, in C.C. No. 80/1998 on the file of the Special Judge, Delhi, assails the judgment dated 19.11.2003 and order on sentence dated 24.11.2003 as per which he has been convicted and sentenced for the offences punishable under Section 7 and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (the PC Act).

2. The prosecution case is that the accused, while employed and posted as Section Officer in the Freedom Fighters Division, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, Lok Nayak Bhavan, New Delhi, on 08.07.1991 and 10.07.1991 demanded and received illegal gratification of ₹2000/- from the complainant, late Devesh Singh, as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top