$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : 16.04.2026 + FAO (COMM) 88/2026 CM APPL. 19795/2026 CM APPL.

19796/2026 MAHESH VALUE PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Appellant Through: Mr. C.M. Lall, Sr. Adv. with Mr.

Rahul Vidhani, Mr. Dhruv Sikka, Mr. Lakshay Gupta, Mr. Saurabh Kumar, Ms. Mokshita Gautam, Ms. Shreya Jain, and Ms. Urvashi Arora, Ms. Yashika Sehgal, Ms Annanya Mehan, Advs. versus RIKHAB CHAND JAIN & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mukul Raao and Ms. Anju Kumari, Advs. for R-1 Mr. Manas Raghuvanshi and Mr.

Gyanendra Rathour, Advs. for R-3 CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA V. KAMESWAR RAO, J. (ORAL)

1. This appeal lays challenge to an order dated 14.03.2026 passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial Court-10), Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi whereby the learned District Judge has by appointing a Local Commissioner, on an application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2, CPC filed by the respondent nos. 1& 2 restrained the appellant from using the trademark ‘TT’ in the following manner:

“ In the facts and circumstances as already discussed a prima facie case appears in favour of plaintiff. Initial