$~204 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : 17.04.2026 + RFA(COMM) 125/2026 SANTOSH KUMARI .....APPELLANT Through: Mr. Kaushal Jeet Kait and Mr.

Parimal Bhatia, Advs.

versus SHASHI BALA .....RESPONDENT Through: Mr. P.K. Malik, Mr. Rohan Malik and Mr. Siddharth Malik, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR

JUDGMENT

DINESH MEHTA, J. (Oral

1. On Court’s intervention and with active assistance of learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent, the parties have entered into an amicable settlement. A duly signed Memorandum of settlement dated

17.04.2026 has been placed, the same is taken on record.

2. The Memorandum of settlement reads as under:

“1. That the terms “FIRST PARTY” and “SECOND PARTY” shall also include their legal heirs, assignees, and attorneys.

2. That both the First and Second parties have decided to amicably settle the dispute and have agreed to the terms and conditions mentioned hereinafter i. That on 17/09/2015, it was amicably settled between the parties that First Party shall sale her undivided 50% share in the built-up structure and the land underneath in property bearing no. C-234, located in Village Bhur