* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 17.04.2026 + ARB.P. 2108/2025 JINDAL FERROUS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sarad Kumar Sunny and Ms. Madhav Binzani, Advocates.

versus A TO Z COMPANY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Alok Raj, Mr. Madhav Suri, Mr. Akhand Shresth Pandey, Mr. Anurag Kumar Singh, Mr. Ashish Kumar Singh, Mr. Ashutosh Pandey and Ms. Akanksha Singh, Advocates. CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL)

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, $~6, seeking the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes arising out of the Service Order dated 02.02.2023, Agreement

2. The Agreement is stated to contain a Dispute Resolution Clause, which contemplates adjudication of disputes arising out of the Agreement, inter se the parties, by way of Arbitration. In this regard,

1 Act

reliance is place on Clause 16 of the Agreement, which reads as under:

“16. GOVERNING LAW AND ARBITRATION This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of India. The Parties shall endeavor to settle all disputes and differences relating to a